MEDICATION / ANTIPLATELET THERAPY
Resistance to antiplatelet therapy
Created 01/12/2021, last revision 07/12/2023
- the term ‘”resistance to antiplatelet drugs” should be reserved for situations where specific laboratory tests have documented the drug’s failure to impact its pharmacological target
- identification of patients with high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) may be useful in predicting their risk of atherothrombotic events
- the ideal laboratory test for this purpose is yet to be established; clinical utility and cost-effectiveness remain uncertain ⇒ monitoring of antiplatelet therapy should be considered investigational and is not currently recommended in stroke prevention guidelines
Clinical resistance
-
stroke recurrence despite the use of antiplatelet agents and confirmed patient compliance
-
laboratory tests may confirm the appropriate block of platelet function corresponding to the antiplatelet agent used
- in such cases, it is crucial to reconsider the possibility of alternative stroke etiology
- e.g., cardioembolism in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (⇒ order repeated ECG Holter or long-term ECG monitoring)
- extensive atherosclerosis with embolization of calcified plaques
- advanced arteriolopathy
- vasculitis or non-inflammatory vasculopathy (moyamoya, carotid artery web, etc.)
“Laboratory” resistance
- laboratory resistance can be defined as the failure of antiplatelet agents to specifically inhibit platelet function
- CLP – failure to effectively block P2Y12 receptors
- ASA – failure to inhibit platelet function in a TXA2-dependent manner
- instead of “resistance”, the terms HPR (High on-treatment Platelet Reactivity) or HRPR (high residual platelet reactivity) are preferred [Garabedian, 2013] [Cattaneo, 2013]
- meta-analyses indicate that resistance occurs in up to 30% of cases; these patients exhibit an increased risk of recurrent stroke/TIA
- there are no clear recommendations for managing patients with laboratory-detected resistance to antiplatelet therapy, or for those with recurrent stroke or TIA already on antiplatelet medication
- exclude:
- patient’s noncompliance
- significant drug interactions (e.g., PPIs with thienopyridines)
- other stroke mechanisms (e.g., cardioembolism, vasculitis)
- there is no evidence to support increasing the dose or switching to a different agent in patients with stroke on aspirin
- routine laboratory testing of treatment efficacy, including CYP2C19 genetics, is not recommended in guidelines (due to insufficient evidence supporting its clinical efficacy)
- aggregometry methods show low correlation and often poor reproducibility (the degree of inhibition varies with the same dose, even when the same method is used)
- it is not clear whether a single or repeated measurement are necessary when testing platelet functions
- it is not clear whether treatment should be adjusted based on results (increasing the dose may improve a laboratory parameter, but the clinical relevance and risk-benefit ratio remain uncertain)
- the trial GIANT suggests that patients with the loss-of-function gene (CLP) may benefit from switching to prasugrel or doubling CLP dose (up to a 5-fold reduction in risk of MI, death, and stent thrombosis with medication adjustment was reported)
- clopidogrel is not recommended for CYP2C19*2 and 3 homozygotes; in heterozygotes (1/2, 1/3), CLP should be used preferably as part of dual therapy
- long-term combined antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is generally not recommended
Testing of resistance
ASA |
The measurement of thromboxane levels
|
VerifyNow Aspirin Assay
|
thienopyridine |
Genetic testing
|
VerifyNow PRU test (P2Y12 Assay)
|
Optic aggregometry (LTA-Light Transmission Aggregometry)
|
|
PFA-100 and 200 test (Platelet Function Analyser-100,200)
|
|
MULTIPLATE (Multiple Platelet Function Analyzer)
|
|
Bleeding test
|
Aspirin resistance
- laboratory resistance = the inability of aspirin to reduce TXA2 production (COX-1 dependent) and subsequently inhibit TXA2-dependent platelet function
Variable response to aspirin may be due to these factors:
|
|
Clinical
Cellular
Genetic
|
- a meta-analysis of 20 trials (prospectively following 2,930 patients with CVD) showed a higher risk of cardiovascular events in patients with aspirin resistance, regardless of the detection method used
- aspirin resistance was detected in 28% of patients
- however, the meta-analysis did not demonstrate a clinical effect of add-on antiplatelet therapy in aspirin-resistant patients [Krasopoulos, 2008]
- aspirin resistance seems to be associated with a more severe neurological deficit (higher NIHSS score) and a greater infarct size in acute stroke patients [Zheng, 2013]
Clopidogrel resistance
- the issue with resistance or variable sensitivity also applies to clopidogrel
- CLP resistance is characterized by the inability to block P2Y12 receptors effectively
- it often occurs in patients who have aspirin resistance as well
- according to meta-analysis, the prevalence of CLP resistance is 27-35%, and patients with resistance have a higher risk of recurrent stroke/TIA, even on DAPT (as indicated by subanalyses of SPS3, CHANCE, and other trials) [Wang, 2016] [Hernandez-Suarez, 2017]
Content available only for logged-in subscribers (registration will be available soon) |
Content available only for logged-in subscribers (registration will be available soon) |