GENERAL NEUROLOGY
Acute stroke management during pregnancy
Updated on 08/10/2024, published on 26/09/2024
- acute stroke during pregnancy and the postpartum period is relatively rare but poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to potential adverse outcomes for both the mother and the fetus
- the estimated incidence is 14-34/100 000 deliveries (Karjalainen, 2021)
- the risk of stroke is increased during the peripartum and postpartum periods, especially in the first 6-12 weeks after delivery (Kittner, 1996) [Kamel, 2014]
- standard acute stroke guidelines should be followed unless modified to address maternal concerns and fetal safety
- collaboration between the stroke and obstetric teams is necessary, and institutions without obstetric services should consider transferring patients to a center with appropriate obstetric expertise
- this chapter focuses on acute stroke care; the etiology and prevention of pregnancy-related stroke are discussed here
Stroke in women of reproductive age
- urine or serum beta-hCG testing is recommended for women of reproductive age with acute stroke/TIA who may be pregnant
- rapidly establish the likelihood of pregnancy based on patient history, last menstrual period, and use of contraception
- in patients with acute stroke, testing should not delay imaging or recanalization
Diagnostic evaluation
- see the separate chapter on Initial management of an acute stroke patient
- pregnancy-related issues will be discussed here
- history, physical examination, and basic neurological assessment should identify stroke symptoms and potential pregnancy-related complications
Blood pressure management
- use standard protocols to manage severe hypertension acutely
- in preeclampsia or severe hypertension with neurological symptoms, the goal is to reduce blood pressure to < 160/110 mmHg
- protocols for magnesium sulfate in severe preeclampsia should be available to reduce the risk of eclampsia
- a stroke secondary to preeclampsia meets a classification of severe preeclampsia and has implications for the timing of delivery
- do not induce hypotension or hypoperfusion
- involve obstetrics/maternal-fetal medicine specialists in assessing the maternal-placental-fetal unit and blood pressure management
- neuroimaging has become an essential part of acute stroke management and is used to:
- differentiate ischemic stroke from hemorrhage and exclude other nonvascular causes (tumors, etc.)
- detect vascular lesions amenable to thrombolysis/embolectomy
- distinguish irreversible infarct from salvageable tissue (assess penumbra and core volumes)
- identify stroke etiology (with implications for stroke prevention)
- detect hemorrhagic stroke and rapidly identify vascular malformations and aneurysms
- MRI and MR angiography/venography are safe during pregnancy and should be preferred; avoid gadolinium unless essential and use the lowest effective dose (potential teratogenic effects) (ACOG Guidelines 2017)
- CT is used in emergencies when MRI is not available; radiation dose is generally below the threshold for fetal harm; discuss risks and use appropriate shielding
Differential diagnosis
- eclampsia with seizures and hypertensive emergencies
- migraine with aura
- conversion disorder
- seizure disorders
- neurovascular syndromes that may be associated with severe preeclampsia
- reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS)
- posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES)
- cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST)
- new-onset severe headaches may represent:
- preeclampsia
- a complication of delivery (e.g., post-dural puncture headache)
- benign primary headache syndrome (e.g., migraine)
- reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS)
- posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES)
- arterial dissection
- pituitary apoplexy/Sheehan’s syndrome
- subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)
- pregnant women with severe headache should be evaluated for intensity (i.e., thunderclap vs. gradual onset) and associated features (e.g., neck stiffness, decreased level of consciousness, nausea/vomiting, vision loss, or focal neurologic deficits); if these are identified, the patient must be evaluated with brain imaging and lumbar puncture if imaging is inconclusive
Management
- management of acute stroke in pregnancy follows general acute stroke management protocols but requires additional considerations to ensure fetal safety
- multidisciplinary collaboration involving neurologists, obstetricians, neonatologists, and anesthesiologists is essential
- Intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring is recommended.
- neurocritical care controls intracranial pressure, maintains cerebral perfusion, and prevents secondary complications
- continuous fetal monitoring is recommended whenever possible, especially during thrombolysis
- delivery decisions are based on gestational age, fetal viability, and maternal stability; severe hemorrhage or eclampsia require urgent delivery
Anesthetic management
- both general and regional anesthesia can be safely administered but require careful planning to avoid hypotension and ensure fetal safety
- in the acute stroke setting, alternatives to general anesthesia should be considered
- interdisciplinary team goals for maternal blood pressure and intracranial pressure can be incorporated into the overall anesthetic plans
- concurrent cesarean delivery and resection of a vascular lesion should be discussed in advance
- preferred antihypertensive agents: labetalol, hydralazine, and nifedipine due to their safety profile in pregnancy
- avoid ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) because of teratogenic risks
- non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should be avoided in severe preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)
- due to its large molecule size, tPA does not cross the placental barrier; there is no evidence of teratogenicity
- there are concerns about placental abruption, intrauterine hemorrhage, preterm delivery, or fetal death
- there are no data from RCTs (pregnancy was an exclusion criterion)
- most case reports and small series are from patients who received thrombolysis for non-stroke diagnoses rather than stroke (PE, valvular thrombosis, DVT, stroke, myocardial infarction)
- in 8 published cases of IVT, only 1 case of uterine bleeding occurred
- according to a published cohort of 28 patients, the risk of TL-related abortion was 8%, and the maternal risk of IVT did not differ from that of non-pregnant patients [Leonhardt, 2006]
- case reports of successful IVT for stroke in late pregnancy have also been published [Wiese, 2006] [Daprich, 2006]
- all recommendations are based on expert consensus (ESO guidelines 2022)
- IVT may be considered on an individual basis for moderate and especially severe stroke when the expected benefit of IVT outweighs the risk of uterine bleeding (ESO guidelines 2022 – expert consensus) (AHA/ASA 2019 IIb/C-LD)
- factors favoring IVT:
- severe, debilitating deficit
- likely benefit of IVT
- MR DWI/PWI mismatch and small lesion on DWI
- likely peripheral occlusion – from M2 distally
- if MT is available and LVO is involved, direct MT is preferable to bridging therapy
- stroke occurring shortly after delivery
- the safety and efficacy of IVT shortly after delivery (<10 days) are not established, and no recommendation exists (AHA/ASA 2019 IIb/C-LD)
- if the stroke occurs > 10 days after delivery, IVT may be given after individual consideration (ESO guidelines 2022 – expert consensus)
- if MT is available and there is a presumption of increased bleeding risk, dMT is preferred (ESO guidelines 2022 – expert consensus)
Mechanical recanalization
- there is relatively limited experience with MT in pregnant women; no RCTs are available
- direct MT may be preferable to bridging therapy for LVO during pregnancy and shortly after delivery
- fetal shielding with lead vests is required (Michel, 2021)
- after a hemorrhagic stroke is confirmed, vascular imaging (MRA/CTA) is performed to identify the source of bleeding and guide further management decisions
- pregnancy is not a contraindication to angiography and treatment of a vascular cause of hemorrhage; delaying necessary maternal care is not reasonable
- recognize and reduce potential fetal risks (radiation and contrast exposure, infection, and arterial puncture complications); use abdominal shielding and judicious exposures
Intracerebral hemorrhage
- therapy focuses on blood pressure control and the identification and correction of coagulopathies
- first-line medications include labetalol, methyldopa, and long-acting nifedipine
- angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) should be avoided
Unruptured cerebral aneurysm
- time-of-flight (TOF) MRA is appropriate to visualize the lesion
- if the patient’s neurological and overall clinical status is stable, deferral of treatment until the postpartum period should be considered
Ruptured cerebral aneurysm
- ruptured aneurysms require urgent treatment
- the decision to coil or clip the ruptured aneurysm should be based on the best available option for the patient, regardless of pregnancy status
- reduce BP to < 140/90 mmHg
- an interdisciplinary approach involving neurosurgeon/endovascular interventionalist, neurologist, and physicians with expertise in maternal-fetal medicine should be used
- maternal safety and outcomes are paramount, and treatment decisions can potentially compromise the fetus
- concurrent cesarean delivery should be considered when possible
Unruptured AV malformation
- individualized approach is required
Ruptured AV malformation
- low-grade symptomatic AVMs amenable to surgical resection should be resected (with or without preoperative embolization) in the same timeframe as it would be for non-pregnant women, with every possible effort to reduce the risk of fetal injury
- the timing of treatment of high-grade AVMs that require a multimodality approach (endovascular/surgery or endovascular/radiosurgery) should be made with an interdisciplinary team, including neurosurgery, neurology, and expertise in maternal-fetal medicine
- maternal safety and outcomes may require treatment decisions that potentially compromise the pregnancy or the fetus
- viable gestational age – consider concurrent cesarean delivery
- pre-viable gestational age – treat as outside of pregnancy to maximize maternal safety
- rehabilitation should start early in acute care and include early mobilization, physical, occupational, and speech therapy tailored to the patient’s needs
- psychosocial support should address the emotional and psychological impact on the patient and family
Early post-stroke management
- determine the cause of stroke as early as possible to guide proper stroke prevention
- rehabilitation should start early during acute care and include early mobilization, physical, occupational, and speech therapy
- psychosocial support should address the emotional and psychological impact on the patient and family
- the risk of stroke recurrence is highest in the peripartum period (the first 12 weeks after delivery); women should be warned about the signs of stroke occurrence/recurrence and the need to contact emergency health services immediately
Intra-partum considerations after stroke
- a history of stroke does not necessarily rule out vaginal delivery
- the decision on the preferred mode of delivery depends on the cause of the previous stroke and the risk of the Valsalva maneuver
- if the patient can tolerate some increased intracranial pressure (i.e., low risk of Valsalva maneuver), unassisted vaginal delivery may be considered
- women in whom increased intracranial pressure should be avoided may be candidates for assisted vaginal delivery (using forceps or vacuum) during the second stage of labor
- neuraxial anesthesia can facilitate a forceps or vacuum-assisted second stage of vaginal delivery
- for women at high risk of intracranial bleeding (due to an unsecured aneurysm, AVM, or a CVST with elevated intracranial pressure), cesarean delivery may be considered, acknowledging its risks
- decisions regarding the mode of delivery should also consider patient preferences and be made on an individual basis
- a history of stroke places the woman in a risk category that would require continuous fetal monitoring
- if delivery is anticipated in preterm or extremely preterm gestation, maternal-fetal medicine and neonatal counseling should be provided
Prognosis
- maternal outcomes
- mortality and morbidity are higher for hemorrhagic stroke than for ischemic stroke; early and successful intervention improves outcomes
- long-term disability is similar to that of the nonpregnant population
- fetal outcomes
- increased risk of preterm birth due to maternal instability or the need for urgent delivery
- fetal hypoxia
- all women should get counseling before future pregnancy